臺北新聞熱綫

(AsiaGameHub) –   A Nevada court has mandated that the online prediction platform Kalshi halt its operations within the state for a minimum of two weeks, representing a significant intensification in the escalating conflict between regulators and prediction market operators across the United States.

Nevada Court Blocks Kalshi in 14-Day Restraining Order

The decision from the First Judicial District Court in Carson City establishes a 14-day temporary restraining order that bars the company from providing contracts related to sports, elections, or entertainment events without appropriate state approval. This marks the first time a US state has compelled Kalshi to stop its operations, even temporarily.

The legal action originates from an ongoing disagreement that started in early 2025 when Nevada’s gaming regulator ordered the platform to discontinue its event-based contracts. Officials contend that these products mirror conventional wagering and should be subject to the state’s stringent gambling regulations. Kalshi insists that its products are financial instruments overseen at the federal level.

Court filings indicate that the judge determined Nevada regulators were probable to prevail in their wider legal dispute. The order emphasized that the state implements thorough regulations on gambling activities and mandates that all operators secure licenses. It observed that Kalshi’s business model, in which users risk money on unpredictable results and the company collects a commission, might satisfy the legal criteria for a wagering system under state law.

Temporary Order Against Kalshi Highlights Tensions Between Gambling and Finance Rules

The court additionally determined that permitting the company to persist in its operations could weaken Nevada’s regulatory structure. Concerns encompassed the lack of ability to oversee participants, block minors from taking part, or guarantee the integrity of events connected to the contracts. Judges concluded that these potential dangers could result in irreversible damage, warranting prompt intervention.

Since temporary restraining orders in Nevada are not subject to appeal, Kalshi must adhere to the suspension while the litigation continues. A subsequent hearing is set for early April, during which the court will evaluate whether to prolong the limitations for an extended duration.

The ruling arrives amidst mounting legal scrutiny on the company throughout numerous states. Regulators across the country are scrutinizing prediction markets and asserting that they circumvent existing gambling regulations. Concurrently, federal agencies have indicated support for categorizing these platforms as components of the derivatives market, generating a complicated legal landscape.

The result of Nevada’s case could carry wider consequences for the futureof prediction markets in the US, as courts persist in deliberating whether these platforms should be governed by financial regulations or gambling statutes.